The quire at Ely Cathedral |
King may well be "History and Economics Editor" at Five Books, but he seems to have fallen foul of the fundamental truth of economics. Namely that the price of something is a very poor indicator of its worth.
Music is such a fundamental part of worship in our churches. It allows the congregation to participate, invites people to pray and settles their mind ready for worship. Music can give words meaning, preparing the congregation for each stage of the service, conferring a sense of inclusivity and enhancing scripture. Just as children are often taught important information via song, music aids memory and connects with the soul. It is comforting, reassuring, and heightens our emotional involvement in worship. It is also a fundamental expression of joy and as such should be the foundation for praising God!
A good example of music reinforcing scripture is Thomas Weelkes "Hosanna to the Son of David". Hosanna to the Son of David is a famous example of the English 'full' anthem – as opposed to the 'verse' anthem, and opens with a majestic six-voice proclamation. It's glorious thick texture shows how effectively music can conjure up an image, it's a joy to sing! The anthem facilitates the visualisation of the scripture, and actually gives the text meaning in a modern world far removed from biblical times. Words alone simply cannot achieve this.
Celebrations have involved music since time immemorial, and Anglican choral music is inseparable from both the Church of England and our Monarchy. Unless King is in favour of a programme of disestablishment and abolition, advocating the survival of our cathedrals and churches at the expense of their music is profoundly impossible. (Our cathedrals were actually *built* for choirs with their wonderful acoustics!)
Westminster Abbey, where I was fortunate enough to sing Evensong in December |
As a chorister parent and former teacher I can perhaps reassure King that the musical education offered in cathedral schools and cathedral style choirs is, in fact, inexpensive and of enormous value to society. Places are earned by ability and potential, not social position or income and they provide children who often have little access to a musical education with unparalleled opportunity. Our choirs are a main source of Mission within the Church of England, at a time when many congregations are dwindling and the average age in the pews is increasing. It's also worth noting that even the best music directors earn significantly less than senior teachers in our schools yet in opening the window to classical choral music they promote skills and enthusiasm which stretch far beyond the individual and benefit whole communities. Cathedral choirs promote more than a tradition; they teach history, which gives the present context, train the mind and bring significant mental health benefits. For many, the chorister experience will enrich their lives for many years to come; for some it will be the foundation for a career in professional music.
And *that* is what is at the foundation of faith; the connection between the soul and our Maker. Prayer may be that connection, but it is the accompanying music which gives it wings.
Excellent, a well written reply to King, stating the full meaning of music in worship, and the important part choirs can play in adding and widening our worship in churches. I wonder how much real experience King has had in attending such choral services in Cathedrals, and actually listening to the music, rather, than counting how many people there are attending, or the cost of training the choirs to produce music of such a high standard to the glory of God.
ReplyDeleteYour comment is spot on ! It appears to be so much easier criticizing something you do not understand rather than researching how important it has been to so many others, on both sides of the pond, for so many years. The Anglican choral tradition is second to none, and should be respected, revered and treasured.
DeleteI was a boy soprano in an Anglican church choir. This has given me a love of classical music and a lifetime of choral singing. Although now an atheist, I still love to sing sacred music from both Catholic & Protestant traditions. My life would be empty without singing.
ReplyDeleteCan't tell you how much I agree with this.
DeleteThe Times should afford you the comment pages with your reply in full.
ReplyDeleteKing should han his head in shame for wasting expensive column inches in The Times
ReplyDeleteSuperbly written and I agree that The Times should afford you the right of reply.
ReplyDeleteWhat musical qualifications does Mr King have? Or is he just an economist who knows "the price of everything and the value of nothing"? Christopher Joseph
I disagree with only ONE point - and that is that this article should not be limited to Cathedral Choirs, but should include ALL Church Choirs! - Most of the same points apply right across the board!
ReplyDeleteCompletely agree. My article is focussed specifically on cathedral choirs in response to King's original article.
DeleteHow I agree with that. I sing in our local Parish Choir (and also a Choral Society) and I miss both so much. That sentence "because it's so fundamentally essential for the soul" describes it exactly. My mental health demands it and is suffering from the lack of it. Singing in the shower or into the phone for a recording just doesn't do it for me - I need to hear the harmonies around me. And I'm pretty certain I'm not the only one who feels like this.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteCathedral music brought my wonderful atheist godmother (shows how broad minded my parents were!) back to the faith. It also provides a first class musical education for kids and has, over the past thirty years, become much more inclusive, with girls' choirs and more recruitment from state schools. This is an excellent piece and should be printed in the Times.
ReplyDeleteWhen you sing you pray twice, once with words, and once with music.
ReplyDeleteWhen you sing, you pray twice, once with the words, and once with the music.
ReplyDeleteChurch-music lovers, just put more money on the proerbial plate when you participate in the liturgy. [You do put money on the plate, right?] This is a cash crisis more than a cultural one.
ReplyDeleteYes you may well be right - now amended! I had double checked yesterday, the rest of Twitter seems to have made the same error...
ReplyDeleteThank you i have not read the article but it seems like a profoundly ignorant shock piece typical of the silly season. I doubt Cathedrals will give one iota of notice to the article and it is best left languishing behind Murdoch’s paywall.
ReplyDeleteI doubt if any chapter will take notice of such a piece. Silent cathedrals will be empty cathedrals. This is a silly season piece of nonsense best left languishing behind Murdoch’s paywall.
ReplyDeleteThe last thing we need is yet another philistine who cannot respect the choices of others, nor someone who is 'insanely' ignorant of the part that sacred choral music plays in the culture and history of this land. Not to mention how the choir schools act as a crucible and support for emerging British musical talent. I would say 'shame on you' Mr. King, but you yourself have made it plain that you lack the qualifications to engage in this discussion. I have spent my lifetime singing choral music in churches and concert halls. I can assure you that our congregations/audiences would be horrified.
ReplyDeleteCathedral Choirs and their music have survived because enough people have desired that it be so. That fundamental rule still applies. What may need to change is the actual time of Evensong, so that even more people than now can enjoy it.
ReplyDeleteReally? Cathedrals need to retain a full-time ‘professional’ choir to sing Goss in E to a handful of people on a cold and wet evening in February? Lay clerks pay is miserably bad (with a few exceptions), but it’s a significant cost to any cathedral. Maybe you pay singers at the weekend, or even have voluntary choirs? Many cathedrals have those anyway. I think there would be plenty of Christians keen to sing in cathedrals at the weekend. You can keep choristers on a voluntary basis. Is it different? Of course it is. But how much does it matter and to how many people? This was all being discussed 20 years ago when I was a cathedral choral scholar and I’d say is even more relevant now. Instead dismissing looking at serious changes as accountants with viewing it as a ‘cost of everything, value nothing’ we should be looking at ways for the model to evolve. The question should be, with service attendance dwindling, what are cathedrals doing to keep them relevant to the 21st century residents of their cities? The argument you quite rightly make is that music enhances worship and many parts of services. It absolutely does and plays a multitude of roles. You should not need a professional choir and several organists to deliver that. NB, full disclosure, I don’t have a Times subscription so haven’t read the full article.
ReplyDeleteyes, I too was shocked, not least by the tone of the article which seemed dismissive of the entire ethos and purpose of church/cathedral music. For many, participants or listeners, it is a pathway to belief as well as an obvious manifestation of the faith of the committed. In all this, the role of the amateur, the routine church choir singer rather than the professional, has been ignored. |It is such people, turning up week after week whose role in the cultural and spiritual life if this nation is being sidelined. Restoring this tradition, once lost,will be difficult to restore.
ReplyDeleteA very well written and considered response Kate. Worship and enhancing faith is not simply about listening to or reading words, but also about the way we perceive and take in messages through our senses. Choral music, paintings, sculptures, architecture and stained glass windows all speak to us in their own way and help us make sense of things especially our relationship with God. You cannot put a price on that!
ReplyDelete